Wednesday, November 5, 2008
22 months...is that all there is to a campaign?
It's over. We have a president-elect. We won't have to watch any more dirty, rotten, mudslinging' "I approved this message" political commercials. When the phone rings, maybe it won't be Hank Williams Jr. or Bono telling me who to vote for. Maybe I won't have to select my candidate by listening to the horrible things each is saying about the other and vote for the lesser of two evils... until next time. (OK...studies show it works. Should it? Is that all there is to an electorate?)
Were campaigns always this long? Were they always this disgusting? I guess I don't want anyone I vote for to be or have an "attack dog."
Canada puts a three-month limit on campaigns. I'm guessing other countries have some constraints. Here, our only constraint is 'how much money you have to spend.' And right there you have a reason most of us never have a chance to listen to a broader array of possibilities. If you don't win the January primaries in New Hampshire and Iowa and you aren't rich or your wife doesn't have her own fortune or you are not a front-runner, you are O-U-T. Do New Hampshire and Iowa actually pick our candidates? Did Dennis Kucinich ever get much air time other than on Saturday Night Live?
Let's be thankful that all of this won't start again until at least after the inauguration. And God bless our President elect. We need a good one.